The battle for “net neutrality” is heating up, and just like in the health care debate, the misinformation campaign on the right is beginning as well. The FCC has proposed regulations that will preserve the open architecture of the Internet, guaranteeing that all content providers are created equal in terms of access. Not surprisingly, the telecoms are jockeying for a model that can best be compared to the Priority Mail system at the Post Office. That model would charge providers a fee to ensure faster delivery. Large providers such as Google could pay the telecoms extra to make sure their packets of data are pushed ahead of content by others who choose not to pay to play.
The beauty of the Internet is that it’s open to everyone. Users pay a connection fee to the telecoms — a fee that is in part based on delivery speed. The faster the connection (via Ted Steven’s infamous series of tubes), the more you pay. But everyone has equal access to those tubes. Nobody’s content gets priority delivery. The Internet has a democratizing aspect. People can communicate across political and geographic borders at near real-time speed. During the aftermath of the Iranian election last June, the Internet proved a vehicle for getting the truth out — that a significant segment of the Iranian populace were willing to stand up and publicly criticize the government for what they saw as a fraudulent vote. Would news of their demonstrations, and the violent response of the government and its henchmen, have gotten out but for the Internet?
That’s what makes the response on the US right to net neutrality both intriguing and predictable. Sen. McCain claims that net neutrality would make the Internet subject to government take-over. Glenn Beck calls it a threat to free speech. How Orwellian can they get? Precisely the opposite is true. Both of them are dancing to the beat of their corporate overlords. McCain’s position is laughable given that a year ago he couldn’t even manage to do his own email. Now he (or more likely one of his aides) twitters. Not surprisingly, McCain has benefited significantly from telecom campaign contributions. And we all remember his “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” quip. Is it really any wonder that he wants as much corporate control over the Internet as possible?
And then there’s Glenn Beck, who is convinced that President Obama’s rescue of General Motors means that the government can now track all GM owners via OnStar. I guess he really wants GM to fail, too, right along with President Obama. His latest insanity is claiming that having an open Internet architecture impinges on free speech.
Next we’ll have the equivalent of death panels. So, what’s the solution? Read the various bills and amendments. Follow the discussion. And research the ties between various members of Congress and the organizations and corporations that fund their campaigns. Then, using facts, speak out and speak up. Lobby your representatives. Yes, this in addition to lobbying your local and state representatives. Remember, democracy is a contact sport. Unless we let them know that we know, they will continue to represent the special interests. If we stay asleep at the switch, we give up our power.