Yesterday, we got an indication of what a la carte government could look like when we learned of the fire department that sat and watched a family’s home burn to the ground because they hadn’t paid their annual fee for fire services. The actions of that fire department touched a chord with many people. It just seemed so very wrong that fire fighters would do such a thing — as wrong as if a hospital turned a seriously ill or injured patient away if they lacked health insurance. Last night the same Tennessee county voted to expand subscription-only fire service, thus putting increasing numbers of families at risk of delay at best and refusal to provide service at worst.
The local mayor compared fire-service to auto insurance, a comparison that may sound correct at first glance. However, closer consideration demonstrates just how crazy that analogy is. Does anyone really think that first responders are like insurance? Yes, we’re required to have insurance on our vehicles — at least liability insurance — should we be involved in a wreck. And if we have a mortgage on our home, we’re required by the lender to have insurance so that the lender is compensated should the property be destroyed. And even if we stay in that home long enough to pay off the mortgage, no sane, rational person would do without fire insurance. Our hospitals are prohibited from turning emergency patients away based on whether they have health insurance.
The irony of the situation in Obion County, Tennessee, is that the county did a study a couple years ago that addressed the best way to provide fire service to all its residents. Section 4 of the report details possible funding options and concludes that the simplest way would have been to raise property taxes by a mere thirteen cents. That solution was deemed the most inflation proof, because as costs and values rose, the revenue would rise accordingly. The subscription-only option was estimated to cost $113 per home, excluding commercial properties. Landlords would have passed the cost onto renters, as with any tax. But the county fathers, largely conservatives who despise taxes, opted for the subscription approach.
Turns out that at least three homes and a barn had previously been allowed to burn, killing household pets, plus a number of horses in the barn fire. And in the most recent incident, the fire actually started as a trash fire in a corn field, a fire that spread to the house. Would the fire department also stand by if people were trapped in a fire at an address that “wasn’t on the list” of people who’d paid their subscription fee?
Have we become so selfish as a society that we are willing to let people’s houses burn to the ground in order to avoid a small tax hike to ensure that everyone has access to basic governmental services? This is insanity. We’re seeing libraries close, fire stations shuttered, governmental offices so short-staffed that they epitomize lousy customer service, teachers laid off, school buildings deteriorating, out-of-date textbooks in overcrowded classrooms. Our roads are crumbling, as are our bridges, water pipes, sewers, and even our electrical grid. We’re been engaged in a “starve the beast” exercise for several decades with a seemingly endless push to cut taxes. Is it any surprise that services are suffering? Except it’s the services that most people depend on that have been starved. Meanwhile conservatives decry the “nanny state” while offering all sorts of perks, tax breaks and regulations filled with enough loopholes you could drive a truck through them to their cronies.
Simply raising taxes won’t solve our problems. But our physical and intellectual infrastructure won’t cure itself without attention and investment. It’s not going to be easy, and it won’t happen over night. We need to educate ourselves about what government can and should do. And we need to fund it so that it can do those things We need to insist that government serve all the people, not just those at the top of the economic ladder. And we need to demand that those at the top contribute to the common good in proportion to their wealth.
I’d like to see each and every person in this country have to pay something in income taxes, even if it’s only $1. That gives everyone some skin in the game.